Forensic Transcription of Kazakh Speech Evidence: Evaluating Whisper and LLM Post-Correction Reliability

Авторлар

  • Nursultan Nyssanov National Institute for Cyber Policy and Research, RSE on REM “Digital Government Support Center”, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan Автор
  • Leila Rzayeva National Institute for Cyber Policy and Research, RSE on REM “Digital Government Support Center”, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan Автор

Кілт сөздер:

Kazakh speech recognition, digital forensics, forensic transcription, low-resource ASR, Whisper fine-tuning, LLM post-correction, evidentiary audio analysis, multilingual speech recognition

Аңдатпа

Digital forensic investigations increasingly depend on transcribing recorded speech evidence—wiretaps, witness interviews, and seized audio—for use in legal proceedings, yet automatic speech recognition (ASR) for low-resource languages such as Kazakh remains unreliable, and no prior work has evaluated whether current ASR and large language model (LLM) post-correction pipelines meet the accuracy and integrity requirements of forensic transcription. Methods. This study presents the first comprehensive evaluation of OpenAI's Whisper models for Kazakh speech-to-text, examining both generic multilingual and language-specific fine-tuned variants, and testing whether general-purpose LLMs (Gemma-2-9B and Qwen2.5-7B) can serve as forensically sound post-correction tools. We evaluate two Whisper variants on 30,489 samples from the Kazakh Speech Dataset, applying rigorous bootstrap statistical analysis and character-level error analysis relevant to the preservation of evidentiary meaning. Results. The Kazakh-specific fine-tuned model achieves a 44.2% relative WER reduction compared to the generic multilingual model (32.86% vs. 58.90% WER), with non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals demonstrating statistical robustness. Critically, general-purpose LLMs fail to improve—and in the case of Gemma, actively degrade (+4.1% WER)—transcription quality, raising integrity concerns for any forensic workflow that would apply uncontrolled LLM post-editing to evidentiary transcripts. Error analysis identifies systematic character-level confusions between Kazakh-specific Cyrillic characters and Russian equivalents, a class of error capable of altering names, locations, and other evidentiary details, with historical or archival recordings exhibiting 2× higher error rates than contemporary material. Conclusions. These results indicate that only language-specific fine-tuned ASR, combined with mandatory human expert verification rather than automated LLM post-correction, can approach the reliability threshold required for admissible forensic transcription of Kazakh speech evidence, and they establish reproducible benchmarking practices and error-risk indicators for forensic deployment of low-resource-language ASR.

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.noStats##

Жүктеулер

Жарияланды

2026-07-23

Журналдың саны

Бөлім

Ғылыми мақала